Alphabetical List | Categorical List
Attention: Posner and Mitchell 1967
Posner, M.J., & Mitchell, R.F. (1967). Chronometric analsis of classification. Psychological Review, 74, 392-409. (pdf)
This experiment uses subtractive analysis to determine how long it takes to make a decision about two letters, dependent on how complex a category discrimination is necessary.

For instance, it's easier to say that AA are the same than Aa than Ea (both vowels). The more analysis needs to be done, the longer it takes.

Bindra, D., Williams, J., & Wise, S.S. Judgments of sameness and difference: Experiments on reaction time. Science, 1965, 150, 1625-1626.

Boring, E.G. A history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1950.

Broadbent, D.E., & Gregory, M. On the interaction of S-R compatibility with other variables affecting reaction time. British Journal of Psychology, 1965, 56, 61-67.

Donders, F.C. Ueber die Schnelligkeit psychischer Prozesse. Pfluegers Archiv fuer Anatomie und Physiologie, 1868, 657-681. cited by G. ten. Doesschate, Notes on the history of reaction time experiments. Philips Technical Review, 1963, 25, 75-80.

Egeth, H.E. Parallel versus serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 1966, 1, 245-252.

Egeth, H.E. Selective attention. Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 67, 41-56.

Fitts, P.M. Cognitive aspects of information processing III: Set for speed versus accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 71, 849-857.

Fitts, P.M., & Switzer, G. Cognitive aspects of information processing: I. The familiarity of S-R sets and subsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962, 63, 321-329.

Gibson, E.J. Learning to read. Science, 1965, 148, 1066-1072.

Hochberg, J. Reading pictures and text: What is learned in perceptual development. Paper presented at the meeting of the XVIII International Congress of Psychology, Moscow, August 1966.

Hyman, R. Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953, 45, 188-196.

McGill, W.J. Stochastic latency mechanisms. In R.D. Luce, R.R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology. New York: Wiley, 1963. Pp. 309-360.

Miller, G.A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, 1960.

Neisser, U. Decision time without reaction time. American Journal of Psychology, 1963, 76, 376-385.

Neisser, U., & Beller, H.K. searching through word lists. British Journal of Psychology, 1965, 56, 349-358.

Nickerson, R.S. Response times for same-different judgments. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1965, 20, 15-18.

Posner, M.I. Information reduction in the analysis of sequential tasks. Psychological Review, 1964, 71, 491-504.

Price, H.H. Thinking and experience. London: Hutchinson, 1953.

Robinson, J.S., Brown, L.T., & Hayes, W.H. Test of effects of past experience on perception. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1964, 18, 953-956.

Sternberg, S. Highspeed scanning in human memory. Science, 1966, 153, 652-654.

Sternberg, S. Two operations in character recognition: Some evidence from reaction-time measurements. Perception & Psychophsyics, 1967, 2, 45-53.

Stone, M. Models for choice reaction time, Psychometrika, 1960, 25, 251-260.

Taylor, P.H. Latency components in two-choice responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 72, 481-487.

This series of studies represents an effort to extend the subtractive method of Donders to the analsysis of depth of processing in simple classification tasks. The stimuli are always pairs of items (letters, nonsense forms, digits) to which S must respond "same" or "different" as quickly as possible. Levels of instruction are physical identity (e.g., AA), name identity (e.g., Aa), and rule identity (e.g., both vowels). By use of the subtractive method, times for matches at leach level are analyzed. The emphasis is not placed upon the times themselves but upon their relevance for understanding the operations and mechanisms involved in perceptual matching, naming, and classifying.